Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] seccomp: keep track of seccomp filters with closed listeners

[Alexander Mikhalitsyn]

On Wed, 2026-01-21 at 13:20 +0100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2025-12-11, Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Let's distinguish seccomp filters with closed listener
> > vs seccomp filters which never had listener.
> > 
> > We can easily do this by using the same ->notif pointer
> > field with help of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
> > 
> > No functional change intended.
> 
> The discussion we had at LPC made me think this would result in a
> (justifiable) functional change to fix this bug, but you're quite
> right
> that this only matters once you enable nested listeners.
> 
> In either case, feel free to take my
> 
> Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, Aleksa ;)

Kind regards,
Alex

> 
> Thanks!