Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Flush exception handling work when RPM level is zero

From: Thomas Yen

Date: Thu Jan 29 2026 - 12:40:36 EST


Hi Bart,

My apologies. I missed that Peter had already replied with his
Reviewed-by tag on this v3 thread before I sent v4.

Since v4 is currently bare of tags but the code is identical, would
you prefer I send a v5 to consolidate all the tags and fix the Cc-tag
ordering? Or should I wait for you and Peter to reply to the v4
thread?

Thanks,
Thomas

On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 1:23 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/29/26 9:19 AM, Thomas Yen wrote:
> > I had just sent v4 (to add the missing Fixes tag) before seeing this
> > message. Since the code logic in v4 is identical to v3, I hope that is
> > acceptable.
> It seems like our emails crossed each other. This is something that can
> happen.
>
> When reposting a patch, Reviewed-by tags should be included. I don't see
> any Reviewed-by tags in v4 of this patch although Peter Wang had posted
> a Reviewed-by?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.