Re: [net-next,v6,01/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Index management

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:53:00 +0530 Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> > When cnt is odd, the final loop iteration has i = cnt - 1, which means
> > subbank_srch_order[i + 1] writes to index cnt, which is out of bounds.
> >
> > For example with cnt = 5, the loop iterates with i = 0, 2, 4. At i = 4,
> > the array access subbank_srch_order[5] overflows the allocated array of
> > 5 elements.
> >
> > While CN20K hardware typically has 32 subbanks (even), the value is read
> > from a hardware register at npc_priv_init() without validation beyond
> > checking for zero. Could this lead to memory corruption if the hardware
> > reports an odd subbank count?  
> subbank count is 16 or 8, depending on SoC variant. i will add a WARN check on
> odd ?

Or just a comment may work to prevent the false positive