Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Proportional newidle balance

[Mario Roy]

I missed stating higher is better for the stress-ng socket tests.

For clarity, I find it difficult to know for certain if a scheduler
patch is good or bad without the prefer-idle-core results. A fix may
resolve an issue. But, only to introduce another. I'm unqualified
to know for certain if the fix in question introduces another.
Because, of the limited CPU saturation anomaly with EEVDF.

EEVDF turns out to be amazing. However, the folks in my circle
including myself are constantly worried about the ups and downs
with EEVDF. Mainly with the stable kernels.

We consider varied testing one way to be certain, including limited
CPU saturation testing. Well, a wish request for the test machines
to include limited CPU saturation, e.g. 100%, 50%, 31.25%, and 25%.
The 25% is helpful in the case the test does 2x the number of given
parameter. Plus wanting to be at/below the number of physical cores.

Thank you for your efforts with EEVDF.