Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] MIPS: Loongson: Make cpumask_of_node() robust against NUMA_NO_NODE
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer
Date: Fri Jan 30 2026 - 09:40:47 EST
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 09:40:06AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> The arch definition of cpumask_of_node() cannot handle NUMA_NO_NODE - which
> is a valid index - so add a check for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h
> index 3414a1fd17835..89bb4deab98a6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (cpu_logical_map(cpu) >> 2)
>
> extern cpumask_t __node_cpumask[];
> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) (&__node_cpumask[node])
> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? cpu_all_mask : &__node_cpumask[node])
>
> struct pci_bus;
> extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *);
> --
> 2.43.5
applied to mips-next
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]