Re: [PATCH 0/4] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer.py: tidy and add type hints
From: Tamir Duberstein
Date: Fri Jan 30 2026 - 15:32:50 EST
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 3:24 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 3:12 PM Miguel Ojeda
> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 8:57 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Applied to rust-analyzer-next, thanks all!
> >
> > To clarify, in most cases, branches are supposed to start from a tag
> > from Linus, not something in between his tags.
> >
> > In addition, the idea was that you would start applying patches next
> > cycle, i.e. normally the branch should start applying patches with an
> > -rc1 or -rc2 base, rather than at this time of the cycle, and e.g.
> > finish around -rc5 time, and then you can send me your PR for that
> > cycle and so on.
> >
> > Let's talk about it in the next meeting or we can schedule a call.
>
> Sure, will plan on it. I've updated the branch to start with a tag.
> Because _this_ series is so invasive, I wanted to get it applied
> sooner rather than later to unblock Jesung and Eliot.
>
> >
> > (The patches seem to be applied with the msgid link and with tags
> > collected, so that is fine :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Miguel
Apologies for the whiplash, I reset the branch back to rc7. In the
meantime, these commits are available in
https://github.com/tamird/linux/tree/ra-next for folks working on the
next round of improvements.