Re: [RFC PATCH] media: Virtual camera driver

From: Jarkko Sakkinen

Date: Mon Feb 02 2026 - 04:22:27 EST


On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:02:14AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:25:37 +0100
> > Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:25:37 +0100
> > > From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, anisse@xxxxxxxxx, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Message-ID: <13939245.uLZWGnKmhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > On pondělí 2. února 2026 0:17:20, středoevropský standardní čas Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > > No. At the machine with the camera, obs can read from a V4L2 input,
> > > > generate a mpeg TS stream, and listen to a UDP port (for instance).
> > > >
> > > > At the remote machine, you can just pass the URL to ffmpeg.
> > >
> > > I can't, I have to feed the stream into Firefox somehow for it to see the stream as a virtual webcam.
> >
> > Motioneye could be used on such scenario. It has a proper web
> > interface, allows multiple users to watch, has login control accepts
> > multiple cameras.
>
> When proposed workarounds move in the area of motion detection systems
> it feels like there was a competion who invents the most impractical
> solution for a practical real-world problem out in the wild.

A trivial Google search shows that the scope of the issue, which is
also (on emphasis) a security issue, and net effect that is caused
of not addressing it properly.

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mauro


BR, Jarkko