Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] iio: industrialio-backend: support backend capabilities

[Tomas Melin]

Hi,

On 02/02/2026 12:28, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Sat, 2026-01-31 at 14:30 -0600, David Lechner wrote:

>>
>> Do we actually need this one? Alternative could be, for example:
>>
>> int iio_backend_enable(struct iio_backend *back)
>> {
>> 	int ret;
>>
>> 	ret = iio_backend_op_call(back, enable);
>> 	
>> 	return ret == -EOPNOTSUPP ? 0 : ret;
>> }
> 
> I would prefer not to assume we can ignore the backend not supporting
> the call. It opens up the question for other operations.
> 
> My preferred way for this kind of fundamental operation (enabling/disabling)
> would be to check with DT maintainers if we could have some kind of fixed-backend
> (fixed in the sense the HW is present but not controlled by Linux) dummy device that
> with implement a no-OP enable/disable().

There is also use cases for the always_on cap with a configurable
non-dummy backend. Some applications are such that the driver should
leave the enabling/disabling up to the user space consuming the data.
For this case it's great to have the frontend leave the backend enable
alone using this capability.

thanks,
Tomas


> 
> - Nuno Sá