RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net PATCH v3] idpf: change IRQ naming to match netdev and ethtool queue numbering

[Salin, Samuel]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Eric
> Dumazet via Intel-wired-lan
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:38 AM
> To: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; intel-
> wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; David Decotigny <decot@xxxxxxxxxx>; Li Li
> <boolli@xxxxxxxxxx>; Singhai, Anjali <anjali.singhai@xxxxxxxxx>; Samudrala,
> Sridhar <sridhar.samudrala@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tantilov, Emil S <emil.s.tantilov@xxxxxxxxx>; Brett
> Creeley <brett.creeley@xxxxxxx>; Loktionov, Aleksandr
> <aleksandr.loktionov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net PATCH v3] idpf: change IRQ naming to
> match netdev and ethtool queue numbering
> 
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 10:56 PM Brian Vazquez <brianvv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > The code uses the vidx for the IRQ name but that doesn't match ethtool
> > reporting nor netdev naming, this makes it hard to tune the device and
> > associate queues with IRQs. Sequentially requesting irqs starting from
> > '0' makes the output consistent.
> >
> > This commit changes the interrupt numbering but preserves the name
> > format, maintaining ABI compatibility. Existing tools relying on the
> > old numbering are already non-functional, as they lack a useful
> > correlation to the interrupts.
> >
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Samuel Salin <Samuel.salin@xxxxxxxxx>