Re: [net-next,v4,7/9] dpll: Add reference count tracking support
From: Simon Horman
Date: Tue Feb 03 2026 - 11:14:05 EST
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
dpll: Add reference count tracking support
This commit adds REF_TRACKER infrastructure support to the DPLL subsystem,
allowing developers to track and debug reference counting leaks for
dpll_device and dpll_pin objects via debugfs.
> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
> --- a/include/linux/dpll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -223,16 +231,17 @@ dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, const struct net_device *dev)
> }
>
> static inline struct dpll_pin *
> -fwnode_dpll_pin_find(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +fwnode_dpll_pin_find(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, dpll_tracker *tracker);
> {
> return NULL;
> }
There appears to be a stray semicolon at the end of the function signature
on the line with the tracker parameter. This would cause a compile error
when CONFIG_DPLL is disabled since the function body follows what looks
like a forward declaration.
Should the semicolon be removed so the stub function compiles correctly?