Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds-lj tree
From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Feb 03 2026 - 13:35:26 EST
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:56:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 12:45:58PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the leds-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> This issue is still present in today's -next, the leds-lj tree is still
> using the version from 8th January.
This means that these commits have never been in -next and we're at -rc8
now:
Daniel Mack (3):
dt-bindings: leds: Add issi,is31fl3293 to leds-is31fl32xx
leds: is31f132xx: Re-order code to remove forward declarations
leds: is31f132xx: Add support for is31fl3293
Nam Tran (3):
dt-bindings: leds: add TI/National Semiconductor LP5812 LED Driver
leds: Add basic support for TI/National Semiconductor LP5812 LED Driver
docs: leds: Document TI LP5812 LED driver
Steffen Trumtrar (3):
dt-bindings: leds: Add LP5860 LED controller
leds: Add support for TI LP5860 LED driver chip
leds: lp5860: Fix unused-but-set-variable warning
Jishnu Prakash (2):
dt-bindings: leds: leds-qcom-lpg: Add support for PMH0101 PWM
dt-bindings: leds: qcom,spmi-flash-led: Add PMH0101 compatible
Lukas Timmermann (2):
dt-bindings: leds: Add new as3668 support
leds: as3668: Driver for the ams Osram 4-channel i2c LED driver
Duje Mihanović (1):
leds: expresswire: Fix chip state breakage
Haotian Zhang (1):
leds: qcom-lpg: Check the return value of regmap_bulk_write()
J. Neuschäfer (1):
dt-bindings: leds: Allow differently named multicolor LEDs
Krzysztof Kozlowski (1):
leds: lp55xx: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop
Vivek BalachandharTN (1):
leds: lm3692x: Fix kernel-doc for struct lm3692x_led
The leds-lj tree in -next currently contains only:
Lukas Timmermann (2):
dt-bindings: leds: Add new as3668 support
leds: as3668: Driver for the ams Osram 4-channel i2c LED driver
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature