Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] s32g: Use a syscon for GPR

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 12:18:54 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> It looks like patch 3/3 depends on 1/3 but it should land in a different
> tree, as patches 1 && 2 looks suitable for 'net-next' and 3/3 should
> probably go via the arm/freescale tree.
> 
> We either need explicit ack from freescale maintainers or this should be
> split across subtrees, right?

FWIW normally we don't touch the dts patch at all, unless the
maintainer chimes in and tells us to take it. No waiting for acks.
Off the top of my head us taking dts patches only happens if 
the person posting the patch _is_ the platform maintainer..

For this series we're waiting for the bindings to be reviewed.