Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] media: qcom: iris/venus: fix power domain handling on SM8250

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 11:40:45AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 at 20:22, Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 05:51:16PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 at 16:46, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2026 at 11:49, Dmitry Baryshkov
> > > > <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > As pointed out by Konrad during the review of SM8350 / SC8280XP
> > > > > patchset, Iris aka Venus description has several flows. It doesn't scale
> > > > > MMCX, the frequencies in the OPP table are wrong, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's correct the Iris/Venus enablement for SM8250 (unfortunately also
> > > > > stopping it from being overclocked).
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Do you want me to pick up patch2 for v7.0 - or what do you suggest at
> > > > this point?
> > >
> > > I'd prefer it if it is picked through the immutable tag/branch.
> >
> > Another option would be to ack merging it through the media tree.
> 
> I didn't think the series was considered as material for v7.0 as it's
> getting late for that.
> 
> Anyway, I have queued patch2 to v7.0 and the patch is also available
> to pull in via an immutable "core" branch in my pmdomain tree.

I think I mixed 7.0 vs 6.20 vs anything. Thanks anyway!

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry