Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/45] TDX: Dynamic PAMT + S-EPT Hugepage

[Dave Hansen]

On 2/4/26 06:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
...
> We can and do have tests and VMM support, but it's all out-of-tree (for now).
> All I'm saying here is that I'm ok landing the S-EPT hugepage code in advance of
> guest_memfd hugepage support, e.g. so that we don't end up in a stalemate due to
> cyclical dependecies, or one big megaseries.

Does "landing" mean having it sit in some topic branch, or pushing to Linus?

I'm all for getting these hellish dependency chains out of the way, but
we usually try pretty hard to avoid having dead/unreachable code in
mainline.

If it is something you want to do in mainline, we should probably do a
bit of cross-x86/kvm brainstorming to make sure there's no other option.