Re: [PATCH v2] smp: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq

From: Frederic Weisbecker

Date: Wed Feb 04 2026 - 11:51:07 EST


Le Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:03:32PM +0100, Marco Crivellari a écrit :
> Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
>
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
>
> This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
> the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
>
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>
> Switch to using system_percpu_wq because system_wq is going away as part of
> a workqueue restructuring.
>
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - improved commit log
> - rebased on 6.18-rc5
> ---
> kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 02f52291fae4..496358eae37c 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int (*func)(void *), void *par, bool phys)
> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> - queue_work_on(cpu, system_wq, &sscs.work);
> + queue_work_on(cpu, system_percpu_wq, &sscs.work);

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs