RE: [PATCH] iio: ABI: fix current_trigger description

From: Cosmin-Gabriel Tanislav

Date: Wed Feb 04 2026 - 14:50:30 EST


> From: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2026 9:44 PM
>
> On 2/4/26 12:02 PM, Cosmin Tanislav wrote:
> > Triggers exist under /sys/bus/iio/devices/, not under /sys/class/iio.
> > /sys/class/iio does not even exist. Use the current path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin-gabriel.tanislav.xa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > index 5f87dcee78f7..4fc9f6bd4281 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > @@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ KernelVersion: 2.6.35
> > Contact: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Description:
> > The name of the trigger source being used, as per string given
> > - in /sys/class/iio/triggerY/name.
> > + in /sys/bus/iio/devices/triggerY/name.
>
> While we are fixing this, the docs refer to it as triggerX rather than
> triggerY.
>

While I do agree that triggerX would match the definition inside
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-trigger-sysfs, I think
triggerY is the correct name here, because iio:deviceX is used
right above. If we were to use triggerX, it would leave the
impression that the X from deviceX and the X from triggerX are the
same value.

> /sys/bus/iio/devices/triggerX is documented, but
> /sys/bus/iio/devices/triggerY/name actually seems to be missing. That is
> for another patch though.
>
> >
> > What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/bufferY/length
> > KernelVersion: 5.11