Re: [PATCH v1] fs: hugetlb: simplify remove_inode_hugepages() return type

[Jiaqi Yan]

Thanks for your reviews, Jane, Muchun, and David

On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 3:41 AM David Hildenbrand (arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/26 00:36, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
> > When remove_inode_hugepages is introduced in
> > commit c86272287bc6 ("hugetlb: create remove_inode_single_folio to remove single file folio")
> > it used to return a boolean to indicate if it bailed out due to race with
> > page faults. However, since the race is already solved by [1],
> > remove_inode_hugepages() doesn't have any path to return false anymore.
> >
> > Simplify remove_inode_hugepages() return type to void, remove the
> > unnecessary ret variable, and adjust the call site in
> > remove_inode_hugepages(). No functional change in this commit.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220914221810.95771-10-mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 18 +++++++-----------
> >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > index 3b4c152c5c73a..83d71cea7e384 100644
> > --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > @@ -515,13 +515,11 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end,
> >    * Called with hugetlb fault mutex held.
> >    * Returns true if page was actually removed, false otherwise.
> >    */
> > -static bool remove_inode_single_folio(struct hstate *h, struct inode *inode,
> > -                                     struct address_space *mapping,
> > -                                     struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index,
> > -                                     bool truncate_op)
> > +static void remove_inode_single_folio(struct hstate *h, struct inode *inode,
> > +                                   struct address_space *mapping,
> > +                                   struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index,
> > +                                   bool truncate_op)
>
> While you are touching this, this would look better with two-tab
> alignment on second parameter line.

For sure, it is adjusted in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260204214741.3161520-1-jiaqiyan@xxxxxxxxxx

>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David