Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Add support for AM62P variants via NVMEM
From: Judith Mendez
Date: Wed Feb 04 2026 - 19:51:18 EST
Hi Andrew,
On 2/4/26 3:54 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 2/4/26 3:37 PM, Judith Mendez wrote:
Add support for detecting AM62P silicon revisions.
On AM62P, silicon revision is discovered with GP_SW1 register instead
of JTAGID register. Use the NVMEM framework to read GP_SW1 from the
gpsw-efuse nvmem provider to determine SoC revision.
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
index 42275cb5ba1c8..4b6947a9ceb4d 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -25,6 +26,9 @@
#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_SHIFT (28)
#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_MASK GENMASK(31, 28)
+#define GP_SW1_VALID_BIT BIT(4)
+#define GP_SW1_ADR_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+
#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_SHIFT (12)
#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_MASK GENMASK(27, 12)
@@ -70,6 +74,29 @@ static const char * const am62lx_rev_string_map[] = {
"1.0", "1.1",
};
+static const char * const am62p_gpsw_rev_string_map[] = {
+ "1.0", "1.1", "1.2",
+};
+
+static int
+k3_chipinfo_get_gpsw_variant(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ u32 gpsw_val, adr_val = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "gpsw1", &gpsw_val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (!(gpsw_val & GP_SW1_VALID_BIT))
+ return 0;
Return -1 here so you will get the warning message about setting default SR1.0.
+
+ adr_val = gpsw_val & GP_SW1_ADR_MASK;
+
+ return adr_val;
Merge the above two lines,
return gpsw_val & GP_SW1_ADR_MASK;
Or maybe try using FIELD_GET() or similar if you are feeling fancy.
+}
+
static int
k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names(unsigned int partno,
struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr)
@@ -86,9 +113,11 @@ k3_chipinfo_partno_to_names(unsigned int partno,
}
static int
-k3_chipinfo_variant_to_sr(unsigned int partno, unsigned int variant,
- struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr)
+k3_chipinfo_variant_to_sr(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int partno,
You pass in the platform_device struct pointer, but only ever use the
->dev member, just pass in the "dev" device pointer.
Otherwise LGTM
Andrew
Thanks for reviewing!
Will fix according to your review and respin the series.
~ Judith