Re: [v4,net-next,01/11] net/nebula-matrix: add minimum nbl build framework
From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Fri Feb 06 2026 - 21:25:04 EST
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email says "This is an automated AI code reviewer, please treat what
it says with a grain of salt."
For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net/nebula-matrix: add minimum nbl build framework
This commit adds the minimal build infrastructure for the Nebula-Matrix
M18100-NIC family driver, including Kconfig, Makefiles, documentation,
and stub PCI driver functions.
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/index.rst b/Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/index.rst
> --- a/Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/index.rst
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> meta/fbnic
> microsoft/netvsc
> mucse/rnpgbe
> + nebula-matrix/nbl
> netronome/nfp
The documentation index references 'nebula-matrix/nbl' but the actual file
created is 'nebula-matrix/m18100.rst'. This will cause 'make htmldocs' to fail
with a broken reference.
Simon Horman flagged this in v3 review:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aXj_f3hsMmvKxC26@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Should this be 'nebula-matrix/m18100' instead?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nebula-matrix/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/nebula-matrix/Kconfig
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nebula-matrix/Kconfig
[ ... ]
> +config NBL_CORE
> + tristate "Nebula-matrix Ethernet Controller m18100 Family support"
Andrew Lunn raised concerns about the NBL_CORE naming in multiple versions of
this patch series. The "_CORE" suffix is typically reserved for libraries shared
by multiple drivers that use 'select' rather than having a tristate prompt.
If this module provides Ethernet functionality directly, the naming convention
would be to call it an Ethernet driver rather than "core".
See v1 and v3 review comments:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/88c7e349-f941-4216-89ca-70a49e82b378@xxxxxxx/
Is there a reason to keep the _CORE suffix, or could this follow standard driver
naming conventions?