Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: mpq8785: add MPQ8786 support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/02/2026 07:46, Carl Lee wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:17:07AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 02:46:29PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 06:01:37PM +0800, Carl Lee wrote:
>>>> Add device type support for MPQ8786
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Carl Lee <carl.lee@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/mps,mpq8785.yaml | 5 ++++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/mps,mpq8785.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/mps,mpq8785.yaml
>>>> index 90970a0433e9..aec7397a29f9 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/mps,mpq8785.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/mps,mpq8785.yaml
>>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
>>>>        - mps,mpm3695-25
>>>>        - mps,mpm82504
>>>>        - mps,mpq8785
>>>> +      - mps,mpq8786
>>>
>>> Your driver code says they are the same, so compatible. Express it with
>>> fallback or provide real rationale in commit msg.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. The mpq8785 datasheet is public, but the mpq8786 datasheet isn't.
>> That makes it all but impossible to determine if there are indeed no
>> notable differences between the chips.
>>
>> Guenter
> 
> There is no chip-specific difference in the driver code to justify
> separate MPQ8786 support. 
> Therefore, Therefore, I will use MPQ8785 for support.

One message is enough.

Best regards,
Krzysztof