Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] nvmet: Rapid Path Failure Recovery set controller identify fields

[Sagi Grimberg]

> Precisely my point. If CQT defaults to zero no delay will be inserted,
> but we _still_ have CCR handling. Just proving that both really are
> independent on each other. Hence I would prefer to have two patchsets.

Agreed. I think it would be cleaner to review each separately. the CCR 
can be based
on top of the CQT patchset, for simplicity.