RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] wifi: iwlwifi: nvm: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq

[Korenblit, Miriam Rachel]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2025 12:09 PM
> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>; Frederic
> Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx>; Michal
> Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>; Korenblit, Miriam Rachel
> <miriam.rachel.korenblit@xxxxxxxxx>; Johannes Berg
> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] wifi: iwlwifi: nvm: replace use of system_wq with

Please change nvm->mvm.
Otherwise looks good to me
> system_percpu_wq
> 
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun with
> the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
>    commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and
> system_dfl_wq")
>    commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.
> 
> Before that to happen after a careful review and conversion of each individual
> case, workqueue users must be converted to the better named new workqueues
> with no intended behaviour changes:
> 
>    system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>    system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
> 
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
> 
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 2.51.1