Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] mmc: host: renesas_sdhi_core: support configuring an optional sdio mux

[Ulf Hansson]

On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 at 17:48, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 at 14:50, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > 2026-02-09 at 14:39, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 at 14:16, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> 2026-02-09 at 10:57, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > >>> I have already applied for v8 and it's going to be in my pull-request
> > >>> for v7.0 in a few hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please send incremental fixes on top instead of a new version of the
> > >>> series, then I can pick them as fixes for v7.0.
> > >>
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> Sorry for being late with this, but as the mux maintainer I'm not
> > >> fond of
> > >>
> > >> 028ec00381f5 ("mux: add help text for MULTIPLEXER config option"
> > >>
> > >> and would not like to see it in rc1. Can you prevent that some way?
> > >
> > > Sorry, but my pull-request and branch was already prepared.
> > >
> > > Please send an incremental patch on top then I can pick it up as a fix
> > > for 7.0-rc1. Unless you want to manage this yourself via your tree.
> >
> > That unfortunate. The patch series has not yet made it to the next
> > tree since it has not seen any updates the last few days. What testing
> > has these patches received?
>
> The patches didn't make it to next, for some reason. I queued them up
> last week on the 4th Feb, definitely a bit of a stretch to pick them,
> I admit that, but I trust Josua to help with any kind of problem to
> show up.
>
> In regards to additional tests and reviews, lots of people have been
> helping out with this and we have also received patchbot reports that
> Josua fixed too, along the road. Moreover, the first version of the
> series was posted already in November last year.
>
> As I said, let's fix any of the problems on top, it should be that hard, right?

/s/should/should not