Re: [PATCH/for-next v4 3/4] cgroup/cpuset: Call housekeeping_update() without holding cpus_read_lock

[Waiman Long]

On 2/9/26 2:23 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> On 2026/2/7 4:37, Waiman Long wrote:
> > +static cpumask_var_t	isolated_hk_cpus;	/* T */
> Can we get this from isolation.c instead?
>
> The name probably shouldn't include 'hk', since it refers to the inverse
> (housekeeping CPUs) of isolated CPUs, right?

The housekeeping_update() will create an inverse of the pass-in isolated 
cpumasks. As for the name, I add hk to indicate this cpumask is for 
passing to housekeeping_update() to update housekeeping cpumask. It is 
not directly related to the cpumasks in sched/isolation.c. Please let me 
know if you have  a suggestion for the name.

Cheers,
Longman