Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] mm: thp: always enable mTHP support
From: Baolin Wang
Date: Tue Feb 10 2026 - 20:13:17 EST
On 2/10/26 9:28 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On 2026-02-10 04:56, Baolin Wang wrote:
On 2/10/26 6:14 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If PMD-sized pages are not supported on an architecture (ie. the
arch implements arch_has_pmd_leaves() and it returns false) then the
current code disables all THP, including mTHP.
This commit fixes this by allowing mTHP to be always enabled for all
archs. When PMD-sized pages are not supported, its sysfs entry won't be
created and their mapping will be disallowed at page-fault time.
Similarly, this commit implements the following changes for shmem:
- In shmem_allowable_huge_orders(): drop the pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
check so that mTHP sizes are considered
- In shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(): don't consider PMD and PUD orders
when PMD-sized pages are not supported by the CPU
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 11 +++++++----
mm/shmem.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 1e5ea2e47f79..882331592928 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
else
supported_orders = THP_ORDERS_ALL_FILE_DEFAULT;
+ if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
+ supported_orders &= ~(BIT(PMD_ORDER) | BIT(PUD_ORDER));
+
orders &= supported_orders;
if (!orders)
return 0;
@@ -122,7 +125,7 @@ unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (!vma->vm_mm) /* vdso */
return 0;
- if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() || vma_thp_disabled(vma, vm_flags, forced_collapse))
+ if (vma_thp_disabled(vma, vm_flags, forced_collapse))
return 0;
/* khugepaged doesn't collapse DAX vma, but page fault is fine. */
@@ -806,6 +809,9 @@ static int __init hugepage_init_sysfs(struct kobject **hugepage_kobj)
}
orders = THP_ORDERS_ALL_ANON | THP_ORDERS_ALL_FILE_DEFAULT;
+ if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
+ orders &= ~(BIT(PMD_ORDER) | BIT(PUD_ORDER));
I think you should also handle the 'huge_anon_orders_inherit' setting in this function if pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() returns false. Shmem as well.
if (!anon_orders_configured)
huge_anon_orders_inherit = BIT(PMD_ORDER);
Good catch. So, would you agree that should set it to BIT(PMD_ORDER - 1)
in this case?
From the documentation:
"
By default, PMD-sized hugepages have enabled="inherit" and all other
hugepage sizes have enabled="never".
"
So if pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() returns false, IMO, we should just skip setting the PMD-sized order for huge_anon_orders_inherit. What I mean is:
if (!anon_orders_configured && pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
huge_anon_orders_inherit = BIT(PMD_ORDER);