Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] mm: thp: always enable mTHP support

From: Baolin Wang

Date: Tue Feb 10 2026 - 20:13:17 EST




On 2/10/26 9:28 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On 2026-02-10 04:56, Baolin Wang wrote:


On 2/10/26 6:14 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If PMD-sized pages are not supported on an architecture (ie. the
arch implements arch_has_pmd_leaves() and it returns false) then the
current code disables all THP, including mTHP.

This commit fixes this by allowing mTHP to be always enabled for all
archs. When PMD-sized pages are not supported, its sysfs entry won't be
created and their mapping will be disallowed at page-fault time.

Similarly, this commit implements the following changes for shmem:

  - In shmem_allowable_huge_orders(): drop the pgtable_has_pmd_leaves()
    check so that mTHP sizes are considered
  - In shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(): don't consider PMD and PUD orders
    when PMD-sized pages are not supported by the CPU

Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/huge_memory.c | 11 +++++++----
  mm/shmem.c       |  4 +++-
  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 1e5ea2e47f79..882331592928 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
      else
          supported_orders = THP_ORDERS_ALL_FILE_DEFAULT;
+    if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
+        supported_orders &= ~(BIT(PMD_ORDER) | BIT(PUD_ORDER));
+
      orders &= supported_orders;
      if (!orders)
          return 0;
@@ -122,7 +125,7 @@ unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
      if (!vma->vm_mm)        /* vdso */
          return 0;
-    if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() || vma_thp_disabled(vma, vm_flags, forced_collapse))
+    if (vma_thp_disabled(vma, vm_flags, forced_collapse))
          return 0;
      /* khugepaged doesn't collapse DAX vma, but page fault is fine. */
@@ -806,6 +809,9 @@ static int __init hugepage_init_sysfs(struct kobject **hugepage_kobj)
      }
      orders = THP_ORDERS_ALL_ANON | THP_ORDERS_ALL_FILE_DEFAULT;
+    if (!pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
+        orders &= ~(BIT(PMD_ORDER) | BIT(PUD_ORDER));

I think you should also handle the 'huge_anon_orders_inherit' setting in this function if pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() returns false. Shmem as well.

if (!anon_orders_configured)
     huge_anon_orders_inherit = BIT(PMD_ORDER);

Good catch. So, would you agree that should set it to BIT(PMD_ORDER - 1)
in this case?

From the documentation:
"
By default, PMD-sized hugepages have enabled="inherit" and all other
hugepage sizes have enabled="never".
"

So if pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() returns false, IMO, we should just skip setting the PMD-sized order for huge_anon_orders_inherit. What I mean is:

if (!anon_orders_configured && pgtable_has_pmd_leaves())
huge_anon_orders_inherit = BIT(PMD_ORDER);