Re: [PATCH bpf v2 3/4] bpf, sockmap: Adapt for the af_unix-specific lock

[Michal Luczaj]

Replying to correct myself:

> Since sockmap update can happen in a tracing prog, can you really expect a
> socket to be always owned?

Ha, but I'm wrong! Of tracers only BPF_TRACE_ITER allows calling
sock_map_update_elem(). And those are supposed to lock_sock(). Except some
don't, e.g. sock_map_seq_show(). Or is there something else I'm missing?