Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] wifi: nxpwifi: create nxpwifi to support

[jeff . chen_1]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 10:42:27 AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Huh, what? No, since when? Read docs in the kernel, it's complete
> misinterpretation of kernel development model.
> 
> Reach to other people in NXP to guide you through basic submission
> guidelines, so you won't be upstreaming 10 year old poor code (like last
> version) or doing such trivial mistakes. They would tell you what you
> have to do.
> 
> 
> > and optional OF handling, but SDIO bring-up does not depend on any DT
> > properties — enumeration is via SDIO VID/PID and the driver works without a
> 
> That's not true. Look at your code - you have OF calls.
> 
> 
> > binding.
> > 
> > The plan is to submit the binding YAML (and any DT properties we actually need,
> > e.g. OOB wake IRQ/regulators) as a separate patchset to the DT maintainers so
> 
> This is not how it works. We won't be reviewing DT submission separate
> from wireless subsystem / maintainers.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

Understood — thanks for pointing this out. My interpretation of the DT
submission workflow was incorrect. Keeping OF code while dropping the
binding is not acceptable, regardless of intent.

I will remove all remaining DT/OF usage in the next revision so the driver
is fully independent of DT. If DT support becomes necessary later, I will
submit both the bindings and the driver-side DT code together in a single
series, following the expected process.

Please let me know if this is the correct direction for the next revision.

thanks and regards,
jeff