Re: [PATCHv2] mm: khugepaged: make scan loops suspend aware
From: Lance Yang
Date: Sat Feb 14 2026 - 01:35:22 EST
On 2026/2/12 17:10, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
On 2/12/26 10:05, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
On (26/02/12 09:44), David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
[..]
If we're fixing an issue, we usually try to identify which commit introduced the
issue.
For example, support for freezing was introduced in
commit 878aee7d6b5504e01b9caffce080e792b6b8d090
Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jan 13 15:47:10 2011 -0800
thp: freeze khugepaged and ksmd
It's unclear why schedule friendly kernel threads can't be taken away by
the CPU through the scheduler itself. It's safer to stop them as they can
trigger memory allocation, if kswapd also freezes itself to avoid
generating I/O they have too.
Now that I am looking through the history, I find:
commit b39ca208403c8f2c17dab1fbfef1f5ecaff25e53
Author: Kevin Hao <haokexin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Dec 20 07:17:53 2023 +0800
mm/khugepaged: remove redundant try_to_freeze()
A freezable kernel thread can enter frozen state during freezing by either
calling try_to_freeze() or using wait_event_freezable() and its variants.
However, there is no need to use both methods simultaneously. The
freezable wait variants have been used in khugepaged_wait_work() and
khugepaged_alloc_sleep(), so remove this redundant try_to_freeze().
I used the following stress-ng command to generate some memory load on my
Intel Alder Lake board (24 CPUs, 32G memory).
I wonder if that made the issue more likely to appear?
Interestingly, we also had in the past:
commit 1dfb059b9438633b0546c5431538a47f6ed99028
Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:33:57 2011 -0800
thp: reduce khugepaged freezing latency
khugepaged can sometimes cause suspend to fail, requiring that the user
retry the suspend operation.
So it's a recurring theme.
Interesting, so 1dfb059b9438633 and 878aee7d6b5504e fixed real
problems "khugepaged can sometimes cause suspend to fail", but
I don't see what exactly b39ca208403c8f2 fixed. Sounds more
like an "optimization"?
Yes, a cleanup. I wonder if it caused harm.
Given that we only scan "khugepaged_pages_to_scan" pages/ptes/etc. before going back to sleep,
I wonder how that can take in your setup that long.
Why does it end up taking something around 20 seconds in your setup?
I only have bug reports at hands, I don't have a repro. Can the fact
that swap reads require S/W decompression (zram) add enough latency?
I guess so. 20 seconds is still a lot.
How is khugepaged_pages_to_scan set in your environment?
Let me check.
cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_to_scan
4096
Hmm, doesn't sound too high. Let me look more.
Yeah, that's not a lot of pages to scan. It's the default (8 * HPAGE_PMD_NR)
Right. 4096 pages is not much to scan :)
This patch lets khugepaged be frozen between VMAs.
But if khugepaged is already collapsing when freeze starts, there
are two places without freeze checks that could take a bit long:
- __collapse_huge_page_swapin() loops 512 pages, calls do_swap_page()
for each swap entry.
- collapse_file() loops 512 pages, calls shmem_get_folio(). If pages
are swapped out, shmem_swapin_folio() is called.
Each swap-in can block for I/O. With multiple pages swapped out, the
cumulative time adds up.
Maybe we also need check points inside these loops to bail out early?
Cheers,
Lance