Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Sun Feb 15 2026 - 22:56:17 EST
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:32PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> The fdlist is currently part of the meta buffer,
Do you mean "already part of"?
> computed during
> put_args.
The only "computation" I can see wrt fdlist in fastrpc_put_args() is
where we calculate it to be at pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles.
So, why do you say that the content of the meta buffer is calculated
there? Did you mean fastrpc_get_args()?
PS. Use full function names and suffix them with (), to be clear in your
description.
> This leads to code duplication when preparing and reading
> critical meta buffer contents used by the FastRPC driver.
"used by the whole entire FastRPC driver" is rather broad...
As far as I can tell, the thing this patch is doing is caching the
"fdlist" address, to avoid having to derive "pages" (and thereby
indirectly "list"), "outbufs", "handles", and then sum these up.
>
> Move fdlist to the invoke context structure to improve maintainability
> and reduce redundancy. This centralizes its handling and simplifies
> meta buffer preparation and reading logic.
I think the patch looks good, but your commit message is too high-level
sales pitch.
Describe the specific problem that you're solving (i.e. you're
recalculating the offset which was known at the time of
fastrpc_get_args()) and leave it at that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index 4f5a79c50f58..ce397c687161 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx {
> int pid;
> int client_id;
> u32 sc;
> + u64 *fdlist;
> u32 *crc;
> u64 ctxid;
> u64 msg_sz;
> @@ -1018,6 +1019,7 @@ static int fastrpc_get_args(u32 kernel, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx)
> rpra = ctx->buf->virt;
> list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars);
> pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars);
> + ctx->fdlist = (u64 *)(pages + ctx->nscalars);
> args = (uintptr_t)ctx->buf->virt + metalen;
> rlen = pkt_size - metalen;
> ctx->rpra = rpra;
> @@ -1120,18 +1122,10 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx,
> union fastrpc_remote_arg *rpra = ctx->rpra;
> struct fastrpc_user *fl = ctx->fl;
> struct fastrpc_map *mmap = NULL;
> - struct fastrpc_invoke_buf *list;
> - struct fastrpc_phy_page *pages;
> - u64 *fdlist;
> - int i, inbufs, outbufs, handles;
> + int i, inbufs;
> int ret = 0;
>
> inbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_INBUFS(ctx->sc);
> - outbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTBUFS(ctx->sc);
> - handles = REMOTE_SCALARS_INHANDLES(ctx->sc) + REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTHANDLES(ctx->sc);
> - list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars);
> - pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars);
> - fdlist = (uint64_t *)(pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles);
>
> for (i = inbufs; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) {
> if (!ctx->maps[i]) {
> @@ -1153,9 +1147,9 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx,
> cleanup_fdlist:
> /* Clean up fdlist which is updated by DSP */
> for (i = 0; i < FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST; i++) {
> - if (!fdlist[i])
> + if (!ctx->fdlist[i])
It wouldn't hurt to keep the local fdlist variable, keeps the code less
noisy - and you don't need to change these two places.
> break;
> - if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)fdlist[i], &mmap))
> + if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)ctx->fdlist[i], &mmap))
Why are the fds stored as u64 in the metadata? Are the actual fd numbers
somehow consumed by the DSP side?
Regards,
Bjorn
> fastrpc_map_put(mmap);
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>