Re: [PATCHv2] mm: khugepaged: make scan loops suspend aware

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (26/02/16 18:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (26/02/16 10:24), David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> > > Maybe we also need check points inside these loops to bail out early?
> > 
> > I'd only do that if we have evidence that it's actually helpful.
> > 
> > @Sergey, with which base page size are you running (4k vs. 16k vs 64k)? I
> > assume your report is on aarch64, correct?
> 
> I had reports from a 2 CPU Intel n50 device, with 4096 PAGE_SIZE.
> I'm trying to repro on that device now (by running suspend/resume
		      ^^^ on a similar device, not exactly the same.
So I guess I wouldn't rule out the possibility of a h/w issue.