Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: pm7250b: Enable Qualcomm BCL device

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 2/13/26 12:55 PM, Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> On 2/6/2026 2:41 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 2/5/26 10:14 PM, Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi wrote:
>>> Enable Qualcomm BCL hardware devicetree binding configuration
>>> for pm7250b.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <manaf.pallikunhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi
>>> index 0761e6b5fd8d..69ad76831cde 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi
>>> @@ -202,6 +202,16 @@ pm7250b_gpios: gpio@c000 {
>>>               interrupt-controller;
>>>               #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>           };
>>> +
>>> +        bcl@1d00 {
>>> +            compatible = "qcom,pm7250b-bcl", "qcom,bcl-v1";
>>> +            reg = <0x1d00>;
>>> +            interrupts = <PM7250B_SID 0x1d 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>> +                     <PM7250B_SID 0x1d 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>>> +            interrupt-names = "bcl-max-min",
>>> +                      "bcl-critical";
>> We should strip the "bcl-" prefix, since these interrupts happen
>> to be under the bcl device
> Ack
>>
>>> +            overcurrent-thresholds-milliamp = <5500 6000>;
>> Is that something that we expect to change between boards, or is
>> that an electrical characteristic of the PM7250B?
> Yes,  It can change based on battery used for that board as these thresholds will be close below battery OCP spec.
> It is not based on pmic spec. Max current threshold support for specific pmic bcl is taken care in driver pmic data.

Okay, so this property must not live in the common PMIC DTSI then..

I think ideally this could be communicated over battmgr, since it already
has a lot of information about the battery that's currently connected to
the device. Do you think that would be reasonable? Would you know who we
could talk to internally?

Konrad