Re: [PATCH] io_uring/cmd_net: split ioctl code out of io_uring_cmd_sock()

[Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen]

On 2/16/26 5:46 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/16/26 9:03 AM, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> > io_uring_cmd_sock() originally supported two ioctl-based cmd_op
> > operations. Over time, additional operations were added with tail calls
> > to their helpers.
> >
> > This approach resulted in the new operations sharing an ioctl check
> > with the original operations.
> >
> > io_uring_cmd_sock() now supports 6 operations, so let's move the
> > implementation of the original two into their own helper, reducing
> > io_uring_cmd_sock() to a simple dispatcher.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Jens, I'm used to net -> net-next taking a week, as it only happens
> > through Linus' tree.
>
> Looks good to me - since this is just a cleanup, let's defer to 7.1.
> I'll kick that off in a week or so, at which point I'll pick this one
> up too.

Thank you, and sorry for posting during the merge window, I always
intended this for 7.1. I just took it as an invite that you merged into
for-next right after committing my fix to io_uring-7.0, given what I
wrote earlier in the RFC: "I plan to submit v1 once that patch
propagates to for-next.". I wasn't expecting it to happen that quickly.