Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Update port_mask while adding multicast entry
From: Siddharth Vadapalli
Date: Mon Feb 16 2026 - 23:51:31 EST
On Mon, 2026-02-16 at 23:45 +0530, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> Hello Siddharth,
>
> On 05/02/26 20:31, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > On 05/02/26 5:05 PM, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> > > Hello Siddharth
> > >
> > > On 05/02/26 13:45, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2026-02-05 at 12:39 +0530, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> > > > > Multicast entry rules are mainly evaluated for receiving traffic and
> > > > > do not
> > > > > require MAC ports to be explicitly associated with them. However,
> > > > > setting
> > > > > associated MAC port's bit to the port_mask of the ALE entry ensures
> > > > > technical correctness and helps maintaining ALE entries linked to MAC
> > > > > ports.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@xxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/
> > > > > ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> > > > > index 5924db6be3fe..967918050433 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> > > > > @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void
> > > > > am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *ndev)
> > > > > cpsw_ale_set_allmulti(common->ale,
> > > > > ndev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI, port->port_id);
> > > > > - port_mask = ALE_PORT_HOST;
> > > > > + port_mask = BIT(port->port_id) | ALE_PORT_HOST;
> > > >
> > > > Since the port_mask setup above is passed to
> > > > 'cpsw_ale_flush_multicast()'
> > > > below, wouldn't it temporarily cause the forwarded multicast traffic
> > > > to be
> > > > dropped?
> > > >
> > > > > /* Clear all mcast from ALE */
> > > > > cpsw_ale_flush_multicast(common->ale, port_mask, -1);
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The code in the driver following the above function call is:
> > > >
> > > > if (!netdev_mc_empty(ndev)) {
> > > > struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
> > > >
> > > > /* program multicast address list into ALE register */
> > > > netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, ndev) {
> > > > cpsw_ale_add_mcast(common->ale, ha->addr,
> > > > port_mask, 0, 0, 0);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > So we do add back the multicast entries for the same 'port_mask' that we
> > > > removed earlier during cpsw_ale_flush_multicast(), but, there is a delay
> > > > between flushing the entries in cpsw_ale_flush_multicast() and adding
> > > > them
> > > > back via cpsw_ale_add_mcast(). During that period, the multicast
> > > > traffic on
> > > > the forwarding path between MAC Ports will be momentarily dropped.
> > > > Please
> > > > clarify if that isn't the case.
> > > >
> > >
> > > When "cpsw_ale_flush_multicast()" is called, it only deletes entries
> > > where the resulting port_mask becomes "0x0" or "ALE_PORT_HOST" (as per
> > > the function implementation "cpsw_ale_flush_multicast()" in cpsw_ale.c).
> > >
> > > For multicast entries shared across multiple ports, the function only
> > > clears the specific port's bit from the port_mask without deleting the
> > > entry itself. This prevents any traffic disruption for other active
> > > ports.
> >
> > Consider two MAC Ports P1 and P2. P1 belongs to multicast group M1 and
> > M2, while P2 belongs only to multicast group M2.
> >
> > If M1 is deleted from the interface for P1, it will trigger the
> > execution of 'am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_set_rx_mode()' function.
> > In the function, we have:
> >
> > port_mask = BIT(port->port_id) | ALE_PORT_HOST;
> > cpsw_ale_flush_multicast(common->ale, port_mask, -1);
> >
> > => At this point, M2 would have also been removed in addition
> > to M1 for P1. As a result, Multicast traffic M2 from P2 to
> > P1 is dropped.
>
> The scenario you have described applies to switch mode operation.
> However, the fix specifically addresses the issue with the MAC mode.
> The fix ensures that in MAC mode, multicast entries are correctly
> associated with the Host port and MAC mode, and it doesn't disrupt the
> traffic as mentioned in the previous reply.
>
> I believe I should be more clear with the issue and the fix. I will post
> the next version with more clarity.
Ok. Please include one or more 'Fixes' tag(s) as well when you post the v2
patch since you have marked this patch with the 'net' suffix implying that
it is a Fix and not a Feature.
Regards,
Siddharth.