Re: "Dead loop on virtual device" error without softirq-BKL on PREEMPT_RT

From: Bert Karwatzki

Date: Tue Feb 17 2026 - 06:25:18 EST


Am Dienstag, dem 17.02.2026 um 11:42 +0100 schrieb Bert Karwatzki:
>
> I just wondered if we can completely skip the
>
> if (READ_ONCE(txq->xmit_lock_owner) != cpu) {
> [...]
> } else 
> {
> /* "Recursion" alert */
> }
>
> check, as the synchronization will we provided by HARD_TX_{LOCK,UNLOCK}.
>

I thought about that again, and it seems like a bad idea as (in the non-preempt) case
other threads trying to access the queue would wait for the spinlock to be freed, perhaps
one can just change the code like this:

commit 05026868843a4eea51d45811d87706f36896e828
Author: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 17 12:08:35 2026 +0100

net: core: dev: don't warn about recursion when on same CPU

This prints a message if we're on the same CPU and the lock is
already taken, in a production use we would of course skip this
message.

Signed-off-by: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@xxxxxx>

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5b536860138d..cac5588640b3 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4784,15 +4784,18 @@ int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
net_crit_ratelimited("Virtual device %s asks to queue packet!\n",
dev->name);
} else {
- /* Recursion is detected! It is possible,
- * unfortunately
- */
-recursion_alert:
- net_crit_ratelimited("Dead loop on virtual device %s, fix it urgently!\n",
- dev->name);
+ net_crit_ratelimited("Lock taken already on %s!\n", dev->name);
+ goto lock_taken;
}
}

+ /* Recursion is detected! It is possible,
+ * unfortunately
+ */
+recursion_alert:
+ net_crit_ratelimited("Dead loop on virtual device %s, fix it urgently!\n",
+ dev->name);
+lock_taken:
rc = -ENETDOWN;
rcu_read_unlock_bh();


With this I get these messages (be skipped in production code)
instead of the "Dead loop on virtual device":

[ 51.994435] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.994546] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.994650] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.994746] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.994845] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.994948] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.995037] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.995128] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!
[ 51.995220] [ T1525] Lock taken already on wlp4s0!


Bert Karwatzki