Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] gpu: nova-core: use core library's CStr instead of kernel one
From: Alexandre Courbot
Date: Tue Feb 17 2026 - 09:11:10 EST
On Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 8:25 PM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 3:45 AM CET, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> The kernel's own CStr type has been replaced by the one in the core
>> library, and is now an alias to the latter. Change our imports to
>> directly reference the actual type.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/gsp.rs | 6 +++++-
>> drivers/gpu/nova-core/nova_core.rs | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs
>> index 68779540aa28..2f7249383e51 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs
>> @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ const fn make_entry_chipset(self, chipset: &str) -> Self {
>> }
>>
>> pub(crate) const fn create(
>> - module_name: &'static kernel::str::CStr,
>> + module_name: &'static core::ffi::CStr,
>> ) -> firmware::ModInfoBuilder<N> {
>> let mut this = Self(firmware::ModInfoBuilder::new(module_name));
>> let mut i = 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/gsp.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/gsp.rs
>> index 9488a626352f..ae3f6581c5b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/gsp.rs
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/gsp.rs
>> @@ -32,9 +32,13 @@
>> /// that scheme before nova-core becomes stable, which means this module will eventually be
>> /// removed.
>> mod elf {
>> + use core::{
>> + ffi::CStr,
>> + mem::size_of, //
>> + };
>> +
>> use kernel::{
>> bindings,
>> - prelude::*,
>> transmute::FromBytes, //
>> };
>
> What's the improvement in this change? Both of the ones factored out are already
> correctly imported through prelude. Let's keep it as is.
Mmm, either they weren't at the time I initially wrote this patch, or
I've been careless (the latter being more likely). I'll remove this.