Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: SVM: Separate recalc_intercepts() into nested vs. non-nested parts

Next message: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf: "Re: [PATCH bpf v1 0/2] libbpf: Remove extern declaration of bpf_stream_vprintk()"
Previous message: Reinette Chatre: "Re: [PATCH RFC v2 08/17] RISC-V: QoS: add resctrl interface for CBQRI controllers"
In reply to: Sean Christopherson: "[PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: SVM: Separate recalc_intercepts() into nested vs. non-nested parts"
Next in thread: Sean Christopherson: "[PATCH v2 3/8] KVM: nSVM: WARN and abort vmcb02 intercepts recalc if vmcb02 isn't active"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Yosry Ahmed

Date: Wed Feb 18 2026 - 18:20:07 EST

On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 03:09:52PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Extract the non-nested aspects of recalc_intercepts() into a separate
> helper, svm_mark_intercepts_dirty(), to make it clear that the call isn't
> *just* recalculating (vmcb02's) intercepts, and to not bury non-nested
> code in nested.c.
>
> As suggested by Yosry, opportunistically prepend "nested_vmbc02_" to
> recalc_intercepts() so that it's obvious the function specifically deals
> with recomputing intercepts for L2.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@xxxxxxxxx>