Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: normalize the return value of gc->set() on behalf of buggy drivers
From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Thu Feb 19 2026 - 04:17:30 EST
On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:57:58 +0100, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> On February 19, 2026 12:52:37 AM PST, Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Commit 86ef402d805d ("gpiolib: sanitize the return value of
>>gpio_chip::get()") started checking the return value of the .set()
>>callback in struct gpio_chip. Now - almost a year later - it turns out
>>that there are quite a few drivers in tree that can break with this
>>change. Partially revert it: normalize the return value in GPIO core but
>>also emit a warning.
>>
>>Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Fixes: 86ef402d805d ("gpiolib: sanitize the return value of gpio_chip::get()")
>>Reported-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aZSkqGTqMp_57qC7@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>---
>> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>index c52200eaaaff82b12f22dd1ee8459bdd8ec10d81..9f7a1a1ebd8365fe933c989caf9e8c544fd9ba0f 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>@@ -2914,8 +2914,12 @@ static int gpiochip_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> ret = gc->set(gc, offset, value);
>>- if (ret > 0)
>>- ret = -EBADE;
>>+ if (ret > 0) {
>>+ gpiochip_warn(gc,
>>+ "invalid return value from gc->set(): %d, consider fixing the driver\n",
>>+ ret);
>>+ ret = !!ret;
>>+ }
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> You want to patch gpiochip_get(). It could be that set() is similarly troublesome, but the report is about get() not working.
>
Gah! I shouldn't send patches before enough coffee. I don't think gpiochip_set()
need the same patching though, it would be very weird for anyone to return
anything else than 0 or -errno.
Thanks, I'll send a v2.
Bart