Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: add gpio-aggregator binding

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 4:29 PM James Hilliard
<james.hilliard1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 3:14 PM Linus Walleij <linusw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 7:29 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 12:00 PM Linus Walleij <linusw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > And as such it would be pretty half-baked wouldn't it...
> > > >
> > > > Probably Geert's suggestion to use the aggregator is a better
> > > > idea.
> > >
> > > I don't know what that is to comment. (Please don't reply with "you
> > > reviewed it" unless it was more recent than last week. :) )
> >
> > I only think it's half-baked if IRQs don't work and you say they
> > do with the right interrupt-map so that's all fine.
> >
> > I'd say James have a go at gpio-map + interrupt-map for external
> > connectors and see how that works.
>
> From my testing, gpio-map does not allow renaming lines.

I'm pretty sure I said that already. There's no reason we can't
support gpio-line-names alongside a gpio-map property. Whether the
kernel supports that or not is not my problem (as DT maintainer).

Rob