Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add AYN Technologies

[Aaron Kling]

On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 10:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 21/02/2026 17:31, Aaron Kling wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 4:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 04:11:11PM -0600, Aaron Kling wrote:
> >>> From: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Add an entry for AYN Technologies (https://www.ayntec.com/)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> This was originally submitted as part of the original Odin 2 submission
> >>> [0], but that series stalled, so submitting this separately. The prefix
> >>> was renamed to ayntec as per the review comment on that patch.
> >>
> >> And why do we want it without the rest? Answering: we don't want unused
> >> binding and nothing in the commit msg explains other options.
> >
> > You have told me repeatedly to not do monolithic series that cross
> > subsystems. So I am working through support for the AYN qcs8550
>
> So why is this patch not with the rest for the same subsystem?
>
> > devices and splitting that into a bunch of different series. Several
> > of those independently reference this vendor prefix and may progress
>
> Which one? I see only one in the patchset pointed by [0]. I really do
> not understand why you are doing it completely different than every
> other upstreaming which you can find on lore.

I literally just said they're not ready yet and that I was trying to
get ahead of them with this. There's almost a dozen new drivers,
several using this prefix, that have to be submitted before the device
trees can be submitted. But fine. I'll just pre-req this to whichever
sets of drivers I get ready to submit first.

> > in any order, so this needs submitted separately. I am submitting it
> > early to try to get it in before the rest are ready, so I don't have
> > to list this as a dependency to all of them.

Aaron