Re: [PATCH 00/38] docs: several improvements to kernel-doc

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 18 Feb 2026, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As anyone that worked before with kernel-doc are aware, using regex to
> handle C input is not great. Instead, we need something closer to how
> C statements and declarations are handled.
>
> Yet, to avoid breaking  docs, I avoided touching the regex-based algorithms
> inside it with one exception: struct_group logic was using very complex
> regexes that are incompatible with Python internal "re" module.
>
> So, I came up with a different approach: NestedMatch. The logic inside
> it is meant to properly handle brackets, square brackets and parenthesis,
> which is closer to what C lexical parser does. On that time, I added
> a TODO about the need to extend that.

There's always the question, if you're putting a lot of effort into
making kernel-doc closer to an actual C parser, why not put all that
effort into using and adapting to, you know, an actual C parser?


BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel