Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/zh_TW: update personal information

From: Haowen Hu

Date: Mon Feb 23 2026 - 22:04:14 EST




On 2/24/26 05:51, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Haowen Hu <srcres258@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Get my personal information updated in the Linux kernel Documentation.
Mainly on:

* The legacy e-mail (2023002089@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) had some issue and
is not accessible now. Replace it with my current e-mail
(srcres258@xxxxxxxxxx).

So ...

diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_TW/IRQ.txt b/Documentation/translations/zh_TW/IRQ.txt
index 8115a7618307..9b27b1f19355 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/zh_TW/IRQ.txt
+++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_TW/IRQ.txt
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ help. Contact the Chinese maintainer if this translation is outdated
or if there is a problem with the translation.

Maintainer: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Traditional Chinese maintainer: Hu Haowen <2023002089@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+Traditional Chinese maintainer: Haowen Hu <srcres258@xxxxxxxxxx>

Despite this claim, you have not touched this translation since 2023.

Guilty for my absence of contributions. For my being busy with daily
routines, I had little time working on the kernel documentation stuff.

And two of the handful of changes you made that year were ... changing
your email address in all of those files.

Sure. Just want to keep things synced as exactly as possible, and so
does the patch mean to be.


I don't think that all this churn this is reasonable, especially for a
translation that appears to have been abandoned. So I don't really want
to apply this. I would suggest you send me an alternative *removing*
that information from those files, optionally leaving a credit for past
work done in Documentation/translations/zh_TW/index.rst. The question
of when this translation becomes too old and should just be removed can
be left for another day.

OK, so do you mean this translation (zh_TW) is planned to be removed
from the entire documentation? I'm working on the update job currently
for the translation to become modern, and you can have a review of my
rework when this is done and the patch is sent. I really want these
texts to be kept in the kernel documentation and they are able to
receive a thorough update to be suitable toward the kernel nowadays.


Thanks,

jon