Re: [PATCH] scripts: sort ver_linux and list in changes.rst
From: Hans Anda
Date: Tue Feb 24 2026 - 02:14:40 EST
On Mon, 2026-02-23 at 14:56 -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Hans Anda <hansa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > It is a pain in the ass to compare the software versions on the running
> > system (scripts/ver_linux) with the minimal required versions (changes.rst).
> >
> > Sort both lists alphabetically
>
> So ... I suspect that the intent, in changes.rst anyway, was to list the
> compilers first and group other stuff roughly by category. But I agree
> it's kind of a mess; if it's really by category, they should be
> explicit.
Well, actually not. i considered categories but decided to sort alphabetically.
Because it is simpler and spared the decisions which tool fits in which category.
> If nobody screams, I am inclined to apply this change. But ...
>
> > Add missing tools in ver_linux
> > (bash, bc, bindgen, bindutils, btrfs, clang, e2fsck, awk, tar, gtags,
> > iptables, kmod, mcelog, mkimage, openssl, pahole, python, Rust, sphinx,
> > squashfs-tools, udev)
> > Fix minor issues (add grub2)
>
> ...these are a separate change and should be in their own patch.
>
i will make a Patch series with the files split.
Thanks for the feedback
Hans