Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: interconnect: OSM L3: Add Eliza OSM L3 compatible

[Abel Vesa]

On 26-02-24 09:14:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/02/2026 09:10, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 26-02-24 08:29:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:49:04AM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >>> Eliza, similarly to SDM845, uses OSM hardware for L3 scaling.
> >>> Document it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 1 +
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
> >>> index 4b9b98fbe8f2..6182599eb3c1 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
> >>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties:
> >>>            - const: qcom,osm-l3
> >>>        - items:
> >>>            - enum:
> >>> +              - qcom,eliza-epss-l3
> >>
> >> I see EPSS, not OSM here. This is also list without SDM845, so I don't
> >> understand explanation in commit msg at all.
> > 
> > So there are two issues here:
> > 
> > 1. EPSS bindings are handled by the OSM schema. I believe this is by
> > design as they basically do the same thing. Interconnect providers for
> > L3 scaling. So the compatible is in the right schema.
> 
> We do not talk here about schema or bindings at all. Look at your commit
> msg:
> "uses OSM hardware"
> so again: EPSS or OSM.

They are basically the same thing.

Will use EPSS instead in the next respin.