Re: [PATCH v2] rust: kunit: fix warning when !CONFIG_PRINTK
From: Alexandre Courbot
Date: Tue Feb 24 2026 - 09:30:47 EST
On Tue Feb 24, 2026 at 10:56 PM JST, David Gow wrote:
> Le 24/02/2026 à 9:07 PM, 'Alexandre Courbot' via KUnit Development a écrit :
>> On Tue Feb 24, 2026 at 8:51 PM JST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> If `CONFIG_PRINTK` is not set, then the following warnings are issued
>>>> during build:
>>>>
>>>> warning: unused variable: `args`
>>>> --> ../rust/kernel/kunit.rs:16:12
>>>> |
>>>> 16 | pub fn err(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) {
>>>> | ^^^^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_args`
>>>> |
>>>> = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
>>>>
>>>> warning: unused variable: `args`
>>>> --> ../rust/kernel/kunit.rs:32:13
>>>> |
>>>> 32 | pub fn info(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) {
>>>> | ^^^^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_args`
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by adding a no-op assignment using `args` when `CONFIG_PRINTK`
>>>> is not set.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: a66d733da801 ("rust: support running Rust documentation tests as KUnit ones")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - Use a no-op assignment instead of the wider `#[allow(unused_variables)]`.
>>>> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260224-unused_var_err-v1-1-c51d805eceb5@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> ---
>>>> rust/kernel/kunit.rs | 8 ++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/kunit.rs b/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
>>>> index f93f24a60bdd..a1edf7491579 100644
>>>> --- a/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
>>>> +++ b/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@
>>>> /// Public but hidden since it should only be used from KUnit generated code.
>>>> #[doc(hidden)]
>>>> pub fn err(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) {
>>>> + // `args` is unused if `CONFIG_PRINTK` is not set - this avoids a build-time warning.
>>>> + #[cfg(not(CONFIG_PRINTK))]
>>>> + let _ = args;
>>>
>>> I think (didn't test) that you can use a conditional attribute [1] instead:
>>>
>>> pub fn err(
>>> #[cfg_attr(not(CONFIG_PRINTK), expect(unused))]
>>> args: fmt::Arguments<'_>
>>> ) {
>>
>> Yup, that works as well, and I think I like it better as it is more
>> localized. Alice, WDYT?
>>
>
> Personally, I have a slight preference for the current `let _ = args`
> option -- we'll still want to be able to format (at least some of) these
> messages to the KUnit test log, even if printk is disabled. So in the
> interest of avoiding churn in the function prototype, this version seems
> more future-proof.
Sounds good - let's keep the current version then.