Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Hot page tracking and promotion infrastructure
From: Gregory Price
Date: Tue Feb 24 2026 - 10:36:18 EST
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:25:13PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >> Time in seconds - Lower is better
> >> Mop/s total - Higher is better
> >> =====================================================================================
> >> Base Base pghot-default
> >> pghot-precise
> >> NUMAB0 NUMAB2 NUMAB2 NUMAB2
> >> =====================================================================================
> >> Time in seconds 7349.86 4422.50 6219.71 4113.56
> >> Mop/s total 53247.66 88493.630 62923.030 95139.810
> >>
> >> pgpromote_success 0 42181834 248503390 41955718
> >> pgpromote_candidate 0 0 577086192 0
> >> pgpromote_candidate_nrl 0 42181834 29410329 41956171
> >> pgdemote_kswapd 0 0 216489010 0
> >> numa_pte_updates 0 42252749 607470975 42037882
> >> numa_hint_faults 0 42183772 606540729 41968150
> >> =====================================================================================
>
> For pghot-default, with target_nid alternating between the available
> toptier nodes 0 and 1, the numbers catch up with pghot-precise and base
> NUMAB2 case as seen below:
> ================================
> Time in seconds 4337.98
> Mop/s total 90217.86
>
> pgpromote_success 42170085
> pgpromote_candidate 0
> pgpromote_candidate_nrl 42171963
> pgdemote_kswapd 0
> numa_pte_updates 42338538
> numa_hint_faults 42185662
> ================================
>
Fascinating! Thank you for the quick follow up.
I wonder if this was a lucky run, it almost seems *too* perfect.
~Gregory