Re: [PATCH 0/6] mailbox: pcc: Refactor and improve initialisation and interrupt handling

[Adam Young]

On 1/27/26 04:29, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:07:26PM -0500, Adam Young wrote:
> > On 1/12/26 11:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 02:40:56PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > Hi Jassi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 08:08:14PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > > This series refines and stabilizes the PCC mailbox driver to improve
> > > > > initialisation order, interrupt handling, and completion signaling.
> > > > Are you happy to pull these patches directly from the list or do you
> > > > prefer me to send you pull request or do you want me to direct this via
> > > > ACPI/Rafael's tree. Please advice.
> > > Hi Jassi,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the nag. I did see these patches in -next as well as your
> > > v6.19 merge window pull request which didn't make it to Linus tree.
> > > However I don't see it -next any longer. Please advice if you want
> > > anything from my side so that this can be merged for v6.20/v7.0
> > I thought you had an approach you wanted to implement for the functions that
> > provided access to the Mailbox internals: you wanted to do them inline but
> > hadn't gotten to them yet.  Is that still the case?  I will resubmit mine as
> > is with -next if that is acceptable.
> Honestly, it has been a while and I have lost the context. Please post what
> you have or thinking of on top of linux-next or jassi's -next and we can start
> the discussion fresh.

The updated patch is posted.  It has a title of

[net-next v31 1/2] mailbox: pcc: functions for reading and writing PCC 
extended data