Re: [PATCH] drm/dumb-buffers: document that it's only for linear FB

From: Thomas Zimmermann

Date: Wed Feb 25 2026 - 03:34:21 EST


Hi

Am 25.02.26 um 09:10 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2026-02-25三的 08:47 +0100,Thomas Zimmermann写道:

Am 25.02.26 um 08:38 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2026-02-25三的 08:26 +0100,Thomas Zimmermann写道:
Hi,

Am 25.02.26 um 07:13 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
The ioctl interfaces for dumb buffers currently only properly
support
linear buffers.

Mention this in the documentation snippet of dumb-buffers
source
code,
which is referenced by drm-kms.rst and will end up in the built
kernel
documentation.

Also mention the existence of current drivers abusing dumb
buffers
for
AFBC to reduce confusion about this.

Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c | 7 ++++++-
We documented the meaning of the color bits and the behavior of
the
dumb-buffer interface at [1]. If anything is missing, it should
be
added
there.
Yes, I saw this piece of document; however it's part of the
interface
document instead of a concept document, and the whole existence of
the
What is a concept document?
Well I am patching this document snippet because it becomes part of the
document at [1] (by being referenced in the .rst file).

That question was a joke, but also not entirely untrue.

These overview sections usually introduce the purpose of a module and give readers a sense of how to use the code; like a tutorial. We don't have concept documents. As the concepts keep changing, they'd bitrot quickly.

For example, not too long ago we discussed the possibility of a CREATE_DUMB2 ioctl that would allow for specifying the DRM format directly. It would also allow formats with multiple planes and non-linear layouts. My point is that whatever we write here today could be obsolete tomorrow. The only stable thing is the user-space interfaces.

IMHO if you think the overview should mention the supported formats, you should link to the UAPI documentation of the ioctl. If we ever get that CREATE2 ioctl, we can refer to this as well.

Best regards
Thomas


[1] https://docs.kernel.org/gpu/drm-kms.html#dumb-buffer-objects

document snippet I am changing can be considered a duplicate of the
interface document.

Thanks
Icenowy

Best regards
Thomas

[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19/source/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h#L1200

   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c
index e2b62e5fb891b..06f74460adf62 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c
@@ -57,7 +57,12 @@
    *
    * Note that dumb objects may not be used for gpu
acceleration,
as has been
    * attempted on some ARM embedded platforms. Such drivers
really
must have
- * a hardware-specific ioctl to allocate suitable buffer
objects.
+ * a hardware-specific ioctl to allocate suitable buffer
objects.
They are
+ * also currently meant for only linear buffers, and using
them
with any
+ * modifier other than DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR is undefined
behavior. There
+ * exist some KMS drivers abusing dumb objects for AFBC
framebuffers, but this
+ * behavior is discouraged, only exists as a hack now and
shouldn't be
+ * replicated.
    */
   static int drm_mode_align_dumb(struct drm_mode_create_dumb
*args,

--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)