Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] cpufreq: Add boost_freq_req QoS request

From: Pierre Gondois

Date: Wed Feb 25 2026 - 03:45:48 EST



On 2/25/26 03:33, zhenglifeng (A) wrote:
On 2/25/2026 1:08 AM, Pierre Gondois wrote:
The Power Management Quality of Service (PM QoS) allows to
aggregate constraints from multiple entities. It is currently
used to manage the min/max frequency of a given policy.

Frequency constraints can come for instance from:
- Thermal framework: acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init()
- Firmware: _PPC objects: acpi_processor_ppc_init()
- User: by setting policyX/scaling_[min|max]_freq
The minimum of the max frequency constraints is used to compute
the resulting maximum allowed frequency.

When enabling boost frequencies, the same frequency request object
(policy->max_freq_req) as to handle requests from users is used.
As a result, when setting:
- scaling_max_freq
- boost
The last sysfs file used overwrites the request from the other
sysfs file.

To avoid this, create a per-policy boost_freq_req to save the boost
constraints instead of overwriting the last scaling_max_freq
constraint.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index db414c052658b..52efa4805afee 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1359,17 +1359,25 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
/* Cancel any pending policy->update work before freeing the policy. */
cancel_work_sync(&policy->update);
- if (policy->max_freq_req) {
+ if (policy->max_freq_req || policy->boost_freq_req) {
/*
- * Remove max_freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
- * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was
- * sent after adding max_freq_req earlier.
+ * Remove max/boost _freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
+ * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was sent
+ * after adding max/boost _freq_req earlier.
*/
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);
- freq_qos_remove_request(policy->max_freq_req);
}
+ if ((policy->max_freq_req && !policy->boost_supported) ||
+ policy->boost_freq_req) {
Is this if statement written in the wrong place?

Yes right ...

I also forgot to remove the below if conditions as you suggessted



+ freq_qos_remove_request(policy->boost_freq_req);
+ kfree(policy->boost_freq_req);
+ }
+
+ if (policy->max_freq_req)
+ freq_qos_remove_request(policy->max_freq_req);
+
freq_qos_remove_request(policy->min_freq_req);
kfree(policy->min_freq_req);