Re: [PATCH v7 RESEND net-next] virtio_net: add page_pool support for buffer allocation

From: Vishwanath Seshagiri

Date: Wed Feb 25 2026 - 06:09:18 EST


On 2/25/26 2:03 PM, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:49:10 -0800, Vishwanath Seshagiri <vishs@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Use page_pool for RX buffer allocation in mergeable and small buffer
modes to enable page recycling and avoid repeated page allocator calls.
skb_mark_for_recycle() enables page reuse in the network stack.

Big packets mode is unchanged because it uses page->private for linked
list chaining of multiple pages per buffer, which conflicts with
page_pool's internal use of page->private.

Implement conditional DMA premapping using virtqueue_dma_dev():
- When non-NULL (vhost, virtio-pci): use PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP with page_pool
handling DMA mapping, submit via virtqueue_add_inbuf_premapped()
- When NULL (VDUSE, direct physical): page_pool handles allocation only,
submit via virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx()

This preserves the DMA premapping optimization from commit 31f3cd4e5756b
("virtio-net: rq submits premapped per-buffer") while adding page_pool
support as a prerequisite for future zero-copy features (devmem TCP,
io_uring ZCRX).

Page pools are created in probe and destroyed in remove (not open/close),
following existing driver behavior where RX buffers remain in virtqueues
across interface state changes.

Signed-off-by: Vishwanath Seshagiri <vishs@xxxxxxxx>
---
Resend for net-next window (no changes from v7).
- v7:
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20260210014305.3236342-1-vishs@xxxxxxxx/

Changes in v7:
- Replace virtnet_put_page() helper with direct page_pool_put_page()
calls (Xuan Zhuo)
- Add virtnet_no_page_pool() helper to consolidate big_packets mode check
(Michael S. Tsirkin)
- Add DMA sync_for_cpu for subsequent buffers in xdp_linearize_page() when
use_page_pool_dma is set (Michael S. Tsirkin)
- Remove unused pp_params.dev assignment in non-DMA path
- Add page pool recreation in virtnet_restore_up() for freeze/restore support (Chris Mason's
Review Prompt)
- v6:
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20260208175410.1910001-1-vishs@xxxxxxxx/

Changes in v6:
- Drop page_pool_frag_offset_add() helper and switch to page_pool_alloc_va();
page_pool_alloc_netmem() already handles internal fragmentation internally
(Jakub Kicinski)
- v5:
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20260206002715.1885869-1-vishs@xxxxxxxx/

Benchmark results:

Configuration: pktgen TX -> tap -> vhost-net | virtio-net RX -> XDP_DROP

Small packets (64 bytes, mrg_rxbuf=off):
1Q: 853,493 -> 868,923 pps (+1.8%)
2Q: 1,655,793 -> 1,696,707 pps (+2.5%)
4Q: 3,143,375 -> 3,302,511 pps (+5.1%)
8Q: 6,082,590 -> 6,156,894 pps (+1.2%)

Mergeable RX (64 bytes):
1Q: 766,168 -> 814,493 pps (+6.3%)
2Q: 1,384,871 -> 1,670,639 pps (+20.6%)
4Q: 2,773,081 -> 3,080,574 pps (+11.1%)
8Q: 5,600,615 -> 6,043,891 pps (+7.9%)

Mergeable RX (1500 bytes):
1Q: 741,579 -> 785,442 pps (+5.9%)
2Q: 1,310,043 -> 1,534,554 pps (+17.1%)
4Q: 2,748,700 -> 2,890,582 pps (+5.2%)
8Q: 5,348,589 -> 5,618,664 pps (+5.0%)

drivers/net/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 467 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
index ac12eaf11755..f1e6b6b0a86f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
@@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ config VIRTIO_NET
depends on VIRTIO
select NET_FAILOVER
select DIMLIB
+ select PAGE_POOL
help
This is the virtual network driver for virtio. It can be used with
QEMU based VMMs (like KVM or Xen). Say Y or M.
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index db88dcaefb20..32aede2b1ed5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <net/netdev_rx_queue.h>
#include <net/netdev_queues.h>
#include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
+#include <net/page_pool/helpers.h>

static int napi_weight = NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT;
module_param(napi_weight, int, 0444);
@@ -290,14 +291,6 @@ struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce {
u32 max_usecs;
};

-/* The dma information of pages allocated at a time. */
-struct virtnet_rq_dma {
- dma_addr_t addr;
- u32 ref;
- u16 len;
- u16 need_sync;
-};
-
/* Internal representation of a send virtqueue */
struct send_queue {
/* Virtqueue associated with this send _queue */
@@ -356,8 +349,10 @@ struct receive_queue {
/* Average packet length for mergeable receive buffers. */
struct ewma_pkt_len mrg_avg_pkt_len;

- /* Page frag for packet buffer allocation. */
- struct page_frag alloc_frag;
+ struct page_pool *page_pool;
+
+ /* True if page_pool handles DMA mapping via PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP */
+ bool use_page_pool_dma;

/* RX: fragments + linear part + virtio header */
struct scatterlist sg[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2];
@@ -370,9 +365,6 @@ struct receive_queue {

struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;

- /* Record the last dma info to free after new pages is allocated. */
- struct virtnet_rq_dma *last_dma;
-
struct xsk_buff_pool *xsk_pool;

/* xdp rxq used by xsk */
@@ -521,11 +513,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats);
static void virtnet_receive_done(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
struct sk_buff *skb, u8 flags);
-static struct sk_buff *virtnet_skb_append_frag(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
+static struct sk_buff *virtnet_skb_append_frag(struct receive_queue *rq,
+ struct sk_buff *head_skb,
struct sk_buff *curr_skb,
struct page *page, void *buf,
int len, int truesize);
static void virtnet_xsk_completed(struct send_queue *sq, int num);
+static void free_unused_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi);
+static void virtnet_del_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi);

enum virtnet_xmit_type {
VIRTNET_XMIT_TYPE_SKB,
@@ -706,15 +701,18 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
return p;
}

+static bool virtnet_no_page_pool(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{

Can we check vi->page_pool?

In virtnet_create_page_pools, we can check
"vi->big_packets && !vi->mergeable_rx_bufs" directly.

Then other calls will be more efficient.

Ack. Will make this change.



+ return vi->big_packets && !vi->mergeable_rx_bufs;
+}
+
static void virtnet_rq_free_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi,
struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf)
{
- if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
- put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
- else if (vi->big_packets)
+ if (virtnet_no_page_pool(vi))
give_pages(rq, buf);
else
- put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
+ page_pool_put_page(rq->page_pool, virt_to_head_page(buf), -1, false);
}



[...]



err_buf:
@@ -2666,32 +2586,40 @@ static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
gfp_t gfp)
{
- char *buf;
unsigned int xdp_headroom = virtnet_get_headroom(vi);
void *ctx = (void *)(unsigned long)xdp_headroom;
- int len = vi->hdr_len + VIRTNET_RX_PAD + GOOD_PACKET_LEN + xdp_headroom;
+ unsigned int len = vi->hdr_len + VIRTNET_RX_PAD + GOOD_PACKET_LEN + xdp_headroom;
+ struct page *page;
+ dma_addr_t addr;
+ char *buf;
int err;

len = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len) +
SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));

- if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(len, &rq->alloc_frag, gfp)))
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- buf = virtnet_rq_alloc(rq, len, gfp);
+ buf = page_pool_alloc_va(rq->page_pool, &len, gfp);
if (unlikely(!buf))
return -ENOMEM;

buf += VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;

- virtnet_rq_init_one_sg(rq, buf, vi->hdr_len + GOOD_PACKET_LEN);
+ if (rq->use_page_pool_dma) {
+ page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
+ addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) +
+ (buf - (char *)page_address(page));

- err = virtqueue_add_inbuf_premapped(rq->vq, rq->sg, 1, buf, ctx, gfp);
- if (err < 0) {
- virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
- put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
+ sg_init_table(rq->sg, 1);
+ sg_fill_dma(rq->sg, addr, vi->hdr_len + GOOD_PACKET_LEN);
+ err = virtqueue_add_inbuf_premapped(rq->vq, rq->sg, 1,
+ buf, ctx, gfp);
+ } else {
+ sg_init_one(rq->sg, buf, vi->hdr_len + GOOD_PACKET_LEN);
+ err = virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx(rq->vq, rq->sg, 1,
+ buf, ctx, gfp);
}

Maybe we should introduce a helper to do this, as the merge mode needs this
too.

Ack. I will add a helper here.



Thanks.