Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: Introduce support for hardware break/watchpoints

[Himanshu Chauhan]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 2:30 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:33:27AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 1:33 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 09:30:24AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 3:55 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:19:17AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Did you miss the comment at the end about the remaining TODOs?
> >
> > No. As I mentioned in the cover letter, the ptrace support is not
> > implemented here. I am actively working on it and these are
> > implemented in ptrace work.
> > The test is done using the perf events directly. The second patch in
> > this patch set has the test application.
>
> Then the patchset should still be marked RFC, since it is not finished.

Why? I disagree.
It enables the debug triggers support with perf. Ptrace will build upon it.

Regards
Himanshu